Templar Globe

Entries from October 2007

Enough, already! Vatican official says Templars book nothing new - I told you so!

October 31, 2007 · 1 Comment

crimesvatican.jpg 

It was billed as the Vatican’s effort to “come clean” and reveal secret documents about the mysterious Knights Templar, the medieval crusading order that has inspired ancient legends and modern novels.

But after seeing exaggerated press reports for two weeks, Bishop Sergio Pagano apparently had had enough.

“I’ve read in the papers that this is about discoveries. In no way can one talk about discoveries — every one of these texts was already known,” he said Oct. 25.

You could almost feel the air going out of the balloon in the packed Vatican conference room, where journalists had assembled for the unveiling of a collector’s edition of Vatican Secret Archives documents on the Templar order.

Since early October, international media had pumped the story, saying parchment records uncovered in the archives would exonerate and rehabilitate the Templars, erasing the charges of heresy that led to the order’s dissolution in 1312.

The idea was that the Vatican was finally divulging information it had long hidden — a notion that tied in vaguely with Dan Brown’s novel, “The Da Vinci Code,” which gave the Templars a role in an ongoing church conspiracy.

But Bishop Pagano, prefect of the Vatican archives, was having none of this.

The new Vatican book is “not a scoop, not something extraordinary, does not reveal or remove penalties that were in fact never imposed, or bring to light hidden things,” he said.

The Vatican wasn’t doing this to celebrate or rehabilitate the Knights Templar, he said. The intent was simply to make scholarly material available in a format of high artistic quality, he said.

Many media reported that the elaborate collector’s edition, titled “Processus Contra Templarios” (”The Trial Against the Templars”), would include a previously secret document called the Chinon parchment, supposedly discovered in 2001 after being misplaced in a Vatican archives drawer.

The Chinon parchment details a 1308 investigation of the Knights Templar ordered by Pope Clement V. It is noteworthy because it shows that Pope Clement absolved the Knights of heresy and wanted at that point to reform the order rather than suppress it.

Bishop Pagano, however, said the Chinon document was not a recent discovery. It was “described perfectly” in a 1912 Vatican archives catalogue and was available to researchers — but researchers didn’t notice until 2001, he said.

What seemed to bother Bishop Pagano most was the hype over a scholarly volume.

“All this noise is not our style,” he said.

“We are still proudly convinced — and perhaps we are in a minority on this — that books should be published, read and studied, not ‘presented.’ Today, books are presented and not even read afterward,” he said.

Bishop Pagano’s blunt words suggested a divergence between scholarship and marketing at the Vatican, an impression that was reinforced when the bishop stood up and left halfway through the press conference.

Scrinium, the company that is publishing the new volume as part of a series of facsimile documents from the Vatican archives, sang a somewhat different tune.

“The whole world is talking” about the new work, it crowed in a statement.

The reason people are attracted to these publications, it said, is that there is huge interest in “the legends, myths and pages of history” that are documented in the Vatican’s files. The Vatican Secret Archives holds too much to classify systematically, and this surfeit of texts and artifacts may yield “new treasures” in the future, it said.

Presumably, Scrinium will be there to market them.

Ferdinando Santoro, president of Scrinium, told Catholic News Service that some media had indeed overly hyped the Templars volume. He acknowledged, however, that the publicity had helped sales of the book.

Although the book’s price tag is 5,900 euros (about $8,400), orders have already been taken for most of the 799 copies printed, he said.

The edition was designed with scholars and libraries in mind, but Santoro said the publicity has generated requests from a much wider audience, including collectors, sheiks, international fashion designers and others wealthy enough to treat themselves to a volume that is hand-sewn, bound in goatskin parchment and embellished with gold decorations.

In this case, the reproduction may be better than the original documents. By using an ultraviolet Wood’s light, experts were able to recover nearly invisible margin notes, some believed written in the hand of Pope Clement as he reviewed the reports of the interrogation of the knights.

Based on the evidence assembled, Vatican scholars say Pope Clement’s suppression of the Knights Templar was dictated by a combination of political events and ecclesial pressures.

Beginning in 1307, King Philip IV of France arrested and tortured many knights, extracting false confessions of heresy and ordering assets seized.

Pope Clement wanted to end abuses in the order and reorganize it, but eventually he bowed to the king’s pressure and formally dissolved the Knights Templar, because he feared a schism of the church in France.

in Catholic News Service

______________________________________________

 I TOLD YOU SO!

I have been telling friends, but refraining from writing it in the Templar Globe until now: this is far from a move form the Vatican to clear the Templars in consequence of the recent pressure from many groups. Far from it. I hope I have time to come to this again this week.

I did tell you so!

The Editor.

Categories: Articles · Books · News · Opinion · Religion · Vatican

Da Vinci Coded: Masterpiece Goes Online in High-Def

October 30, 2007 · 1 Comment

davinci.jpg 

Leonardo da Vinci’s masterpiece “The Last Supper” has not aged well. After centuries of degradation, the painting can now be seen by only a handful of viewers at a time in an effort to hide it from outside pollutants. Now, officials have put a 16-billion pixel image of the painting online for anyone to see. The resolution is 1,600 stronger than an image taken on a 10 megapixel camera.

The high-resolution allows viewers to look at details as though they were inches from the art work, in contrast to regular photographs, which become grainy as you zoom in, said curator Alberto Artioli.

“You can see how Leonardo made the cups transparent, something you can’t ordinarily see,” said Artioli. “You can also note the state of degradation the painting is in.”

Besides allowing experts and art-lovers to study the masterpiece from home, Artioli said the project provides an historical document of how the painting appears in 2007, which will be valuable to future generations of art historians.

Although there appeared to be problems with the Web site late Saturday, it was accessible earlier in day.

The work, in Milan’s Church of Santa Maria delle Grazie, was restored in a painstaking effort that wrapped up in 1999 — a project aimed at reversing half a millennium of damage to the famed artwork. Leonard painted “The Last Supper” dry, so the painting did not cleave to the surface in the fresco style, meaning it is more delicate and subject to wear.

“Over the years it has been subjected to bombardments; it was used as a stall by Napoleon,” Artioli said. The restoration removed 500 years of dirt while also removing previous restoration works that masked Leonardo’s own work.

Even those who get to Milan have a hard time gaining admission to see the “Last Supper.” Visits have been made more difficult by measures to protect it. Twenty-five visitors are admitted every 15 minutes to see the painting for a total of about 320,000 visitors a year. Visitors must pass through a filtration system to help reduce the work’s exposure to dust and pollutants.

Follow this link look at the High-Def: http://www.haltadefinizione.com/en/

A great idea. Let’s hope others follow on. I would love to have a few High-Def pictures of Poussin!

Categories: Italy · News · Religion · in English

Javier Sierra: «Los templarios conocían América antes de Colón»

October 29, 2007 · 2 Comments

jsierra-g.jpg 

Antes que autor de ficción de éxito -su novela ‘La cena secreta’ (2004) ha sido un ‘bestseller’ mundial-, Javier Sierra (Teruel, 1971) se dedicó al periodismo paranormal y fue considerado el ‘niño prodigio de la ufología española’. Redactor de revistas como ‘Año Cero’ y ‘Más Allá’, que llegó a dirigir, escribió centenares de artículos sobre ovnis y presuntos enigmas. ‘La ruta prohibida’ (Planeta, 2007), su último libro, se centra en misterios de la Historia que, según él, «llevan siglos aguardando a ser desvelados».

-En su obra, se pregunta: «¿Acaso la Historia (con su inmerecida H mayúscula) se ha ocupado alguna vez de los ‘pequeños’ indicios?».

-Bueno, considero que no ha profundizado en ellos o no les ha dado la relevancia que tienen. La tesis del libro es que la Historia es incomprensible sin el factor ocultista, sobrenatural… Muchos grandes personajes actuaron cómo lo hicieron porque profesaban creencias de ese tipo. El reinado de Felipe IV, por ejemplo, sería absolutamente incomprensible sin tener en cuenta la influencia de su correspondencia con sor María Jesús de Ágreda.

-Que él creía que se comunicaba con el Más Allá.

-Exactamente. Y la utilizó de médium para comunicarse con su mujer fallecida y el príncipe Baltasar Carlos. Todo el mundo ha recurrido a estas cosas para justificar ciertos actos, pero la Historia ha metido el factor creencias debajo de la alfombra, cuando es muy importante para entender muchas cosas.

-Los historiadores no pasan eso por alto. Otra cosa es que esa monja fuera un personaje clave del reinado de Felipe IV.

-Hombre, no fue el conde-duque de Olivares. Pero que el rey decida en un momento prescindir de los servicios del conde-duque se entiende, en buena medida, gracias a la correspondencia con sor María Jesús.

-Quizá sea sólo un factor más, ¿no?

-Para mí, importante.

-No he encontrado en su libro nada que obligue a los historiadores a cambiar una fecha.

-¿Por ejemplo?

-La del Descubrimiento de América, que usted anticipa.

-Lo que mantengo es que habría que cambiar ese dogma de que América no se conocía hasta 1492.

Historia y dogmas

-¿Se refiere a los vikingos?

-No. De hecho, en el capítulo que dedico al mapa de Vinlandia, que algunos consideran la prueba de que los vikingos descubrieron América hacia el año 1000 porque aparece cartografiada una zona que parece la bahía del Hudson, lo pongo en jaque. Al hacer el análisis espectrográfico de la tinta, da que no tiene más de…

-Unos ochenta años.

-¿Como mucho! El mapa de Vinlandia es un falso histórico.

-Entonces, ¿quiénes conocían América antes de Colón?

-Yo hablo del siglo XIII. ¿Quiénes tenían flota en esa época? Los templarios. Y doy una serie de indicios: la piedra de Westford, en Massachusetts, que contiene un ‘graffiti’ de un caballero con una espada…

-Decir que es un caballero con una espada…

-Es lo que parece.

-Pero las cosas no son siempre lo que parecen.

-Pero tampoco al contrario.

-¿Dónde están las pruebas de que los templarios llegaron a América?

-Hay indicios, sólo indicios. No se han encontrado los restos de un barco templario; pero sí indicios como el ídolo de Carabuco, en Colombia. Es una escultura precolombina de un señor con barba, cuando los indios del altiplano son lampiños.

-¿A algunos les parece barba!

-Sí, vale. Pero no está fuera de contexto. En Tiahuanaco, está también el monolito Kontiki, con barba.

-…

-Vale, con lo que parece barba, pero es mucha barba.

-Son indicios, mientras que pruebas del Descubrimiento de 1492 las hay a patadas.

-Sí.

-Sin embargo, usted dice que Colón llegó a América siete años antes.

-Son indicios. Uno piezas sueltas e intento vislumbrar una explicación. Yo las explicaciones contundentes me las guardo para las novelas.

-Entonces, ¿qué base de realidad hay en las afirmaciones que hace en ‘La ruta prohibida’?

-Es que yo no pretendo imponer un dogma sobre otro.

-No estamos hablando de dogmas. La Historia no es un dogma.

-No pretendo imponer un escenario histórico sobre otro. Digo que, dentro de la Historia que nos han contado, hay una serie de indicios que no encajan, de piezas incómodas de las que no se habla. Éste es un libro en el que no he partido de una visión preconcebida de los temas. Habló del manto de la Virgen de Guadalupe y me encuentro con que el profesor Garza Valdés, un creyente en la sábana santa, sostiene que es una pintura, y no una imagen milagrosa. No me interesa mantener mitos clásicos del misterio por mantenerlos.

-Como… ¿por ejemplo?

-En los capítulos sobre la catedral de Chartres admito que, cuando escribí ‘Las puertas templarias’, me equivocé con el ‘milagro de la luz’, según el cual el día del solsticio de verano un rayo de luz pasa por un agujero de un vitral del templo e incide sobre una loseta marcando el arranque de la nueva estación. ¿Qué pasa? Que me he encontrado con que ese milagro no es del XII, sino que es del XVIII.

-Es el milagro del que habla Louis Charpentier en ‘El enigma de la catedral de Chartres’, ¿no?

-Exacto. Yo soy un ‘fan’ de Charpentier. Lo admito. Pero Charpentier se equivocó al atribuir el milagro de Chartres al siglo XII, cuando es un reloj astronómico del XVIII.

-No es raro que se equivoque. Usted dice en su libro, basándose en él, que las primeras catedrales francesas forman sobre el mapa la constelación de Virgo, y no es así.

-Tienes razón. Pero Charpentier no elige una constelación cualquiera, sino Virgo, que encaja muy bien con las catedrales dedicadas a Nuestra Señora. Lo que me fascina de esa historia es que es paralela a lo que hacen otras civilizaciones de la Antigüedad imitando constelaciones con sus monumentos.

-Pero la ubicación de las primeras catedrales no se corresponde con la constelación de Virgo. Las que cita Charpentier no sólo no son las primeras catedrales, sino que algunas no son catedrales. Además, las mueve de sitio… Es como si usted y yo elegimos unas capitales de provincia determinadas para decir que representan en España la constelación de Tauro. Las encontraremos. Y eso es lo que hace Charpentier, según los historiadores.

-Ja, ja, ja… La teoría de Virgo no es aceptada por los historiadores, pero, por otro lado, hay historiadores que han buscado en laberintos la constelación de Teseo. ¿Qué pasa, que para unas cosas sí y para otras no?

El cielo en la Tierra

-Despende de las pruebas.

-Trascendiendo el detalle, los antiguos tenían una obsesión por el cielo y por imitar en la Tierra lo que veían en los cielos.

-Desde que aparece la agricultura, el hombre necesita de la astronomía para controlar el paso del tiempo.

-Yo hablo de algo más que usarla para el calendario. Me refiero a cosas como la interpretación de ‘Las Meninas’ como un talismán astrológico, una teoría de Ángel del Campo Francés, miembro de la Real Academia de Bellas Artes de San Fernando. Este señor pone en relación la pintura y la astronomía.

-Dice que ‘Las Meninas’ refleja…

-La constelación de Corona Borealis, siguiendo los corazones de los personajes principales, y Capricornio si se cierra el círculo y se extiende hacia los otros personajes. La estrella más importante de Corona Borealis se llama Margarita, como la infanta protagonista del cuadro, y Capricornio era el signo de Mariana de Austria, la esposa de Felipe IV, que había sufrido dos abortos y tenía a toda la corte pendiente de que pariera un varón.

-Pero Corona Borealis tiene seis estrellas y los personajes cuyos corazones aparecen unidos por una línea en su libro son cinco.

-Es que esta imagen (explica ante la de la constelación que aparece en su libro) procede de un catálogo moderno. A mí, Ángel del Campo me dijo que en los catálogos de Diego Velázquez eran las mismas estrellas. Probablemente la más pequeña tenga una magnitud que pasaba desaparecida para algunos catálogos de aquella época.

-Buscando y buscando, a todo se le puede encontrar una explicación ‘ad hoc’.

-Es que yo no las busco. Ángel del Campo da una explicación coherente a por qué Diego Velázquez pinta esa obra de tema menor en unas proporciones de lienzo tan importantes como el retrato ecuestre de Felipe IV. El pintor da una importancia impresionante a esta obra, para que sólo sea exhibida en una estancia del Alcázar de Madrid.

-El que paga, manda.

-Sí. Pero es que en esa época, yo parto de ese concepto, hay una intencionalidad narrativa detrás de cada obra de arte. Quieren contar algo o quieren que sirva para algo. Yo no se la había encontrado a ‘Las Meninas’ hasta que Ángel del Campo dijo que es un talismán astrológico. En aquella época se creía en eso.

in El Correo Digital

Categories: Books · Interview · News · Opinion · Spain · en Castellano

The Vatican and the Knights Templar

October 26, 2007 · No Comments

knights_templar_1024.jpg 

The reality of the saga of the Knights Templar is almost as amazing as the myths that embellish it. On Thursday the Vatican added another colorful chapter by it publishing a long-misplaced, 699-year-old papal report on the medieval holy warriors. Vatican publisher Scrinium offers 799 copies (the 800th will go to the Pope), at $8,375 apiece, of a 1308 parchment titled Processus Contra Templarios (Trial Against the Templars), which chronicles the order’s sordid endgame: the accusations of heresy, the Templars’ defense, and Pope Clement V’s absolution of the order, before he did an about-face and eliminated it.

Interest in the group extends far beyond the ranks of Church historians, of course. The tale of the Templars remains a gaudy thread woven through the religion, politics and literature of Western civilization, with a recent boost from the embellishments of Dan Brown, who cast the Knights as a key part of the conspiracy to conceal Church secrets in his best-seller The Da Vinci Code.

Almost from their founding, the Templars have been rumored
a.) to still exist
b.) to be impossibly rich, and
c.) to guard the Holy Grail (the cup from which Jesus drank at the Last Supper) and other Christian relics.

Most of these stories are probably baseless, although for 150 years in the high Middle Ages, their order was incontestably one of the most powerful and creative military and economic forces in the world.

The Templars were a creature of the Crusades, when various Christian forces sailed from Europe to fight the resident Muslims for control of the biblical Holy Land. After the first Crusaders took Jerusalem in 1096, European pilgrims began streaming into the city, and 23 years later, two veterans of the Crusade founded an order of monastic knights to protect the travelers. They were allotted a headquarters in Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque, viewed by Jews and many Christians as the site of the Temple of Solomon — hence the new group’s name. Initially modest (its coat of arms was two knights on one horse because that was all they could afford), its fortunes skyrocketed when the Vatican extended it extraordinary privileges, exempting it from local laws, taxes and any authority but the Pope’s. Suddenly it was bestowed with spectacular gifts of money and land and inundated by volunteers from some of Europe’s most noble families. Well-equipped and trained Templar knights became one of the most formidable fighting forces in the Holy Land — 500 Templar knights are said to have played a major role in defeating a Muslim force of 26,000 in 1177’s Battle of Montgisard.

Their non-military exploits were more ambitious still. For the convenience of the monied pilgrims they chaperoned through hostile turf, the Templars developed a system whereby they left their wealth and lands at the disposal of a Templar institution at home, in exchange for a coded invoice that was then redeemed at the group’s headquarters in Jerusalem. Researchers believe the Templars kept any revenues generated by the estates, effectively accruing interest — a practice otherwise forbidden as usury by the Church at the time. The journal American Banker wrote in 1990 that “a good case can be made for crediting [the Templars] with the birth of deposit banking, of checking, and of modern credit practices.” It certainly made them some of Europe’s richest and most powerful financiers. The Templars have been described as taking crown jewels and indeed entire kingdoms as mortgage for loans, and they maintained major branches in France, Portugal, England, Aragon, Hungary and various Mid-Eastern capitals. The group controlled as many as 9,000 estates, and left behind hundreds of buildings great and small. (The London subway stop Temple is named after one of them.)

But many of the myths attending the secretive order have less to do with their financial empire than with their most famous piece of real estate. Who knew what wonders they might have unearthed digging beneath the Mosque to the alleged Temple of Solomon, not far from where Christ was crucified? They claimed to own a piece of the True Cross; they may very well have possessed the Shroud of Turin, since it was a Templar descendant’s family that first made it public; and unsubstantiated rumor has put them in possession of both the Ark of the Covenant and the Holy Grail. The latter claim provided an inexhaustible source of inspiration for fabulists from medieval romance peddlers to Dan Brown.

Unless you take The Da Vinci Code as a work of history, however, the glory didn’t last. The order lost its purpose and credibility when the Muslim warrior Saladin drove the Crusaders from Jerusalem in 1187, setting the Templars on a path of retreat that saw them give up their last Mid-Eastern foothold, in what is now Syria, in 1303. From there, the decline was precipitous: The Templars failed in an effort to take control of Cyprus, and then, in 1307, Philip IV of France found it more convenient to order the arrest and torture of the Templars to extract confessions of heresy than to repay his heavy debts to the order. This led to the trial under Pope Clement, who was based in Avignon and under the protection of Philip.

The document the Vatican will release Thursday, misplaced in its archives until 2001, is reportedly the official transcript of that trial and Clement’s 1308 verdict, which found the Templars to be immoral but not heretical. The Pope allegedly intended to reform them. But under continued pressure from his French protector, Clement instead disbanded them in 1312 and gave most of their riches to a rival military order.

The notion of that much money, power and influence vanishing at a Papal penstroke appears to have been too much for the mythic sensibility of the West, which wanted to believe that the Templars must somehow have survived, adapted, or been subsumed into another, even more secretive trans-national group. Over the centuries, the allegedly still-extant order has been portrayed as malevolent, benign, heroic and occult. Organizations all over the world, without any direct connection, have appropriated its name. (The Freemasons reportedly have an “Order of the Knights of Templar,” thus consummating a kind of conspiracy theorist’s dream marriage.) Such homages should not obscure the fact that however much power they enjoy in the realm of fiction and fantasy, it almost certainly does not equal that which they once actually possessed — and then abruptly lost.

by Alessandro Bianchi / Reuters

Categories: Articles · Books · News · Opinion · Religion · Vatican · in English

The Post editorial board: The truth about the Templars

October 25, 2007 · No Comments

foxe048.gif 

Last week, the Vatican announced that it will publish an expensive limited edition of the proceedings of the 1308 papal trial of the Knights Templar, the medieval crusading order of warrior-monks that for two centuries was both the most dreaded military force in the Western world and a staggeringly powerful corporation operating largely independent of any state or crowned head. The rediscovered documents, part of the Secret Archive of the papacy, are coming to light at a strange time. Thanks to a burgeoning industry of conspiratorialist and anti-clerical history books begotten by the success of Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code, the Templars remain a living presence in popular culture. This has happened precisely because the historical record concerning their sudden annihilation in the early-14th century at the hands of Philip IV (”the Fair”) of France has been so sparse and ambiguous. Time and revolution have damaged and dispersed the sources, and made the Templars a magnet for speculation and imagination.

It is curious that people like Mr. Brown should use the Templars as a means of building a counter-myth to Roman Catholicism. It was a secular power, the French crown, that bullied the Church into seizing Templar assets and liquidating the order’s leadership. Behind the scenes, the papacy did as much as it could to give the Templars a fair shake. This was long known, but what has now come to light for the first time is a specific contemporary account of Pope Clement V’s Processus contra templarios, including private interviews with Templar officials imprisoned by Philip IV. The documentation started to emerge in 1995, when palaeographer Barbara Frale first found a trove of Clementine documents accidentally bound together with later papers. Professor Frale has succeeded, through stubborn attention to damaged and near-indecipherable papers, in completing the portrait of Philip IV’s attack on the Templars.

In the 12th and 13th centuries the prestige of the Templars and their spearhead role in recapturing the Holy Land for Christianity made them a popular avenue of charity. Their direct connection to the Pope made them almost totally exempt from secular taxation. And pilgrims and other knights used them as a bank, handing over their lands and goods at home in exchange for use of what we would now call an international chequing account. Some have described them as the first ever multinational. As their income and power grew, they began to lend to monarchs, but they were soon to discover the depth of kingly ingratitude. They also attracted envy and hostility from the secular public. Philip IV, deeply in hock to the Templars and eager to lay hands on their property, used his control of the French Inquisition to accuse them of heretical practices, seizing their lands and arresting their leaders in 1307. Soon the Church had to bow to Philip IV’s power, disband the order, and burn the Grand Master, Jacques de Molay, at the stake.

One major point of controversy over the years has been whether there was any truth at all to the charges. No one has doubted that Philip obtained confessions by means of torture, but were the accusations a complete fabrication, or did the Templars’ consciousness of real guilt make the assault easier? (This is a debate that has echoes in modern times; analysts of Soviet show trials of the 1930s had trouble believing that torture and Bolshevik discipline alone could combine to produce surreal confessions of treason and sabotage.) Prof. Frale’s analysis of the pope’s inquiry suggests that Philip did in fact have a kernel of truth to work with. Clement apparently concluded that the Templar order probably did make new members spit upon the cross, deny Jesus Christ and plant “obscene kisses” on the bodies of senior officers.

This would not have been surprising, since it was common for medieval guilds and military orders to bind new recruits together by making them do unspeakable things, often involving mockery of religion. Hazing in the military, fraternities and sports hasn’t really changed much. And the ceremony would have had the added benefit of preparing Templar warriors for humiliation and forced apostasy in the event of capture by Muslims. Clement thought the Templars were not beyond reform, and we now know that he personally absolved de Molay, who had harboured his own hopes of eliminating financial and behavioural excesses. But Clement’s French cardinals, unwilling to confront Philip, stood in the way; and when Philip started rounding up Templar assets, other European kings fell in line.

Perhaps this version of the story seems unromantic compared to fairy tales about the Holy Grail and hidden descendants of Jesus. But in a world where finance and political power interact in complicated ways, where governments grapple with footloose “non-state actors” driven by religious passions, where torture is in the headlines every day and where ever freer use is made of asset-forfeiture laws, it would be unfortunate if the true unvarnished tale of the Templars and their enemies were obscured behind a veil of fictions. As William Faulkner reminded us, “The past isn’t dead; it isn’t even past.”

in National Post - Canada

Categories: Articles · Crusades · News · Opinion · Vatican · in English

Especial viajes: Ponferrada, “la ciudad de los templarios”

October 24, 2007 · 1 Comment

pont.jpg 

Ponferrada, la capital de El Bierzo, se levanta en la confluencia de los ríos Sil y Boeza, en la provincia de León. El camino jacobeo fue fundamental para la ciudad e incluso de ahí deriva su nombre, según los historiadores. Los escritos señalan que la construcción de un puente en el siglo XI sobre el río Sil para que los peregrinos pudieran pasar de una orilla a otra dio lugar a la población al ser conocida como Pons Ferrata , que significa puente de hierro.

Ponferrada es una localidad rica en patrimonio cultural e histórico y siempre estará vinculada a un hecho que le ha dado personalidad propia a lo largo de los siglos, la llegada a la ciudad de la Orden del Temple en 1178 para proteger a los caminantes que se dirigían a Santiago. A destacar el Castillo, una de las razones por las que Ponferrada es conocida como la ciudad de los templarios .

Además la visita a esta ciudad leonesa puede ser aprovechada ahora para disfrutar de la exposición Las edades del hombre , la más importante de las que se han organizado en nuestro país sobre el arte religioso. El patrimonio de las once diócesis de Castilla y León se exhibe fuera de las catedrales de la región y en esta ocasión se muestran 130 obras de primera categoría entre pinturas, esculturas, relieves, orfebrería y libros. El lugar elegido es la Basílica de Nuestra Señora de la Encina e Iglesia de San Andrés y los tesoros podrán ser vistos hasta noviembre de este año.

La visita

Castillo de Ponferrada. Se encuentra situado en una colina que domina el río Sil desde sus 60 metros de altura. Ocupa una extensión de 8.000 metros cuadrados en el cruce del Camino de Santiago entre León y Villafranca. Cuando llegaron los templarios se encontraron una pequeña fortaleza construida sobre un poblado romano, que pasarían a ampliar hasta convertirla en una gran fortaleza. Cuando la Orden del Temple desaparece en 1312, el castillo empieza a cambiar de propietario hasta que llega a los Reyes Católicos, quienes lo venden posteriormente al Marqués de Villafranca. Actualmente es propiedad del Ayuntamiento.

El Castillo de Ponferrada fue declarado en 1924 Monumento Histórico-Artístico. Es una de las visitas ineludibles si estás en Ponferrada porque es de los pocos castillos de propiedad pública que se conservan parcialmente en buen estado.

Basílica de la Encina. Es el monumento religioso más importante de la ciudad. Su estilo renacentista alberga a la Patrona de la ciudad y del Bierzo, la Virgen de la Encina. Según cuenta la tradición, los templarios encontraron su imagen en el hueco de una encina, donde fue escondida para protegerla de los sacrilegios de los invasores árabes. La construcción de la basílica se inició en 1573.

Iglesia de San Andrés. Esta situada a los pies del castillo. Se comenzó a construir a finales del siglo XVII y en su interior se encuentra el Cristo de la Fortaleza, trasladado allí desde la capilla del castillo. Muy cerca de la iglesia está Convento de las Concepcionistas Franciscanas. Al ser de clausura no puede visitarse pero sí su iglesia, en la que hace poco se descubrió una importante cubierta mudéjar que ha sido restaurada.

Torre del Reloj. Se encuentra en la calle que lleva el mismo nombre, una de las más típicas del casco antiguo de Ponferrada. La calle discurre por un arco, que pertenecía a la muralla medieval sobre el que se levanta la Torre del Reloj, del siglo XVI.

Casa de los Escudos. Se presenta como una casona solariega de la familia García de las Llanas de estilo barroco con influencias rococó. En la actualidad es propiedad del Ayuntamiento de Ponferrada y alberga el Museo de la Radio que ofrece un viaje educativo y sensorial por la historia de la radio en España.

Museos en Ponferrada. Puedes visitar el Museo del Ferrocarril, en las vías de la antigua estación de Ponferrada. Allí puedes encontrar locomotoras y vagones restaurados con la intención de dar a conocer la importancia que este medio de transporte tuvo para la ciudad desde su llegada, en 1882.

Otra opción es el Museo de El Bierzo, en la antigua cárcel de la villa, construida en el siglo XVI por orden de Felipe II. Consta de varias zonas, desde el Paleolítico hasta el siglo XIX. El Camino de Santiago tiene su propia sala.

Valle del Silencio: Lleva este nombre desde hace catorce siglos porque fue el refugio de uno de los primeros grupos de eremitas. Hay que visitar Peñalba, declarado Conjunto Histórico Artístico, uno de los pueblos más bellos de nuestro país.

Las Médulas. En las cercanías de Ponferrada se encuentran las ruinas de las minas romanas de Las Médulas, declaradas Patrimonio de la Humanidad por la UNESCO. Eran empleadas para extraer oro. Algunos historiadores destacan que los romanos consiguieron hacerse con unos 960.000 kilos del preciado metal.

in EuropaPress

Categories: Articles · Opinion · Spain · Templar Sites · en Castellano

En busca de la huella de los templarios en la Corona de Aragón

October 23, 2007 · No Comments

monzon.jpg

 Investigadores de la historia y del patrimonio se reunirán la semana que viene en Monzón para poner al día los conocimientos sobre la presencia de esta Orden en las encomiendas aragonesas. Los aspectos esotéricos son difíciles de rastrear en los archivos.

Por segundo año consecutivo, Monzón va a ser sede de las Jornadas sobre la Orden del Temple en la Corona de Aragón, un foro donde especialistas en distintos ámbitos del conocimiento histórico y del patrimonio van a poner en común las últimas investigaciones sobre la presencia y actividades de las distintas encomiendas que los templarios sostuvieron en territorios de la Corona aragonesa.

Las jornadas, organizadas por el Centro de Estudios de Monzón y Cinca Medio (Cehimo), se celebrarán durante toda la semana próxima y ayer, como prólogo, se inauguró una exposición en la Sala Xauradó de la Casa de la Cultura montisonense, titulada “Castillos de la Ruta del Temple”, con fotografías de José Bravo Santamaría.

Las distintas ponencias que se desarrollarán profundizarán en la “indiscutible importancia de la Orden del Temple en zonas del Cinca Medio, Litera y parte del Somontano”, según el responsable del Cehimo, Jaime Peralta. Este experto en patrimonio participará en una de las conferencias, como director del equipo de investigación histórica y arqueológica del Cehimo, titulada “Nuevas aportaciones arqueológicas sobre la Orden del Temple y el Camino de Santiago en Monzón y Cinca Medio”. Se van a presentar los resultados de los últimos trabajos arqueológicos en torno al castillo de Monzón, una de las más importantes fortificaciones que ocuparon los templarios en Aragón y donde resistieron los últimos caballeros hasta mayo de 1309, por la persecución de que fueron objeto tras su caída en desgracia en el Papado y en las monarquías europeas. Estos trabajos han conseguido sacar a la luz al menos tres tumbas de otros tantos peregrinos que hacían el Camino de Santiago, lo que refuerza la teoría de que la Ruta Jacobea pasaba por este localidad aragonesa. También están ayudando a conocer mejor la estructura de los edificios del perímetro del castillo en la época que esta fortificación estuvo ocupada por los templarios y que fueron modificados por necesidades defensivas en siglos posteriores.

Un pasado oscuro

Este año, las jornadas se van a desarrollar pocos días después de la publicación de un libro, con el beneplácito del Vaticano, que rehabilita la memoria de los templarios, al hacerse públicos determinados documentos que confirman que las acusaciones de herejía de que fueron objeto los miembros de la Orden del Temple se debieron a un montaje.

En opinión de Jaime Peralta, nunca es tarde para retractarse y reconocer que los templarios fueron maltratados injustamente, siguiendo el ejemplo del anterior reconocimiento de errores y tropelías que llevó a cabo la Inquisición. “Fueron unos hechos que se produjeron en un contexto histórico determinado, que tuvieron su razón de ser histórica en el momento en que los poderes establecidos deciden acabar con el enorme poder de los templarios, de quienes tampoco se puede afirmar que fuese oro todo lo que reluce”, afirma el director del Cehimo.

El aspecto esotérico

Esa huella, la del supuesto esoterismo que rodeaba a esta orden, es la más difícil de investigar, dada la escasa documentación histórica en la que se pueden rastrear las presuntas prácticas contrarias a la ortodoxia cristiana, según confirma la historiadora zaragozana Ana Isabel Lapeña, quien cerrará las jornadas con una conferencia titulada “La vida interna de una encomienda templaria”. En todo caso, señala, todas las especulaciones se basan en los silencios que envuelven al origen de la orden, y recuerda que los templarios fueron absueltos en el proceso a que fueron sometidos en Aragón, pese a lo cual la orden fue disuelta con la fuerte resistencia de encomiendas como las de Castellote y Monzón.

Más fácil es acercarse a la organización y funcionamiento interno de las encomiendas, gracias a los documentos de carácter económico que pueden encontrarse en los archivos, aunque todavía queda mucho por investigar en torno a la mayoría de las encomiendas templarias de la Corona de Aragón, coinciden en afirmar Jaime Peralta y Ana Isabel Lapeña. Esta historiadora tratará en su intervención aspectos como el organigrama de una encomienda, en cuya cúspide se situaba el comendador. Otros cargos importantes eran el claviger, que se ocupaba de las cuestiones económicas, el capellán -ya que los templarios no tenían por qué ser clérigos-, y el consejo de la encomienda. Se detendrá especialmente en el caso de la encomienda de Novillas, la primera que hubo en la Corona de Aragón.

By J. Zaragoza, in Heraldo.es

Categories: Calendar Addition · Events · News · Spain · Templar Sites · en Castellano

In the Footsteps of the Crusaders

October 22, 2007 · 1 Comment

jer05.jpg 

The Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem, the name by which the Crusaders’ rule over the Holy Land is commonly known, lasted from 1099, when the Crusaders ”rescued Jerusalem from the yoke of the infidel,” as one contemporary account put it, to 1291, when the city of Acre was retaken by the Moslems. At its zenith the kingdom stretched from Beirut to Elath, from the Mediterranean to the Jordan and beyond.

Even though the kingdom was in a constant state of siege, a building boom of a magnitude rarely equaled in the land occurred during the period of Crusader rule. Despite man-made and natural disasters the Israeli landscape is still dotted with 12th- and 13th-century remains, and a visitor can soon learn to recognize the idiom of Crusader architecture in the Holy Land.

There were three types of construction: military, religious and civilian. Forts and castles, churches and monasteries, inns, markets and hospitals were built by the Crusaders to defend their holdings and to serve the needs of pilgrims. The style was basically Romanesque with some early Gothic elements; a few local motifs were introduced by native craftsmen.

In Jerusalem, the city that had beckoned from afar, Crusaders’ footprints abound. Capture of the city came after a five-week siege. The heat was intense; food and water were scarce, and from the seemingly impenetrable walls of the Holy City the Moslems taunted their foe. On Friday, July 15, 1099, Godfrey of Bouillon and his men finally scaled the wall and won the battle for Christendom. A terrible massacre ensued. Old men, women and children were slaughtered. The Jews, who had fought alongside the Moslems, were locked up in a synagogue and set on fire. Blood was flowing in the streets, ankle-deep.

Later that day, Godfrey, Tancred and the other leaders of the First Crusade made their way to the Church of the Holy Sepulcher. They went barefoot, wrote one Crusader, ”through the holy places . . . where Jesus Christ the Saviour lived in the flesh. Devoutly they kissed the places where his feet had trod.” At the church they found evidence of the damage inflicted earlier in the century by the Egyptian Caliph el-Hakim. Soon, refurbishing of the church began; it was completed and celebrated in 1149, 50 years to the day after the Crusaders’ victory.

Unlike the interior, the facade has changed little since the 12th century. The double portal (the right one has been blocked since the days of Saladin, the Moslem ruler) and the two corresponding windows on the second floor are accented by three archivolts supported by engaged columns. The capitals with a foliage motif and the rosette-frieze were common to local architecture since the Byzantine period. The voussoirs - the evenly shaped stones in the arches - may have also been influenced by Eastern masons. The carved lintels of the portal, depicting scenes from the life of Jesus, have been removed to Jerusalem’s Rockefeller Museum for preservation. On the terraced roof, near the Ninth Station of the Cross, are the remains of the Crusader refectory and cloisters. The remains now surround a cluster of mud huts -the Ethiopian holding in the Holy Sepulcher - where old monks reside.

Southeast of the Holy Sepulcher are the Three Covered Bazaars, built to produce income for the Order of the Templars and the Church of St. Anne. Light enters the bazaars through apertures at the top of the groin vaults; the shops, still in use, are small and dark. The central bazaar, Suq el-Attarin, was known as Rue de Malquisinat (the Street of Bad Cooking) for the quality of the roasted meats sold to pilgrims there. Not all foods were poor, however. Oranges, peaches and bananas were available, along with a variety of breads, and local wines kept chilled in snow from Lebanon. Game - partridges, cranes, wild boar - was consumed by the Crusaders, and poultry could be purchased on nearby David Street, in a huge vaulted hall with massive piers - today’s vegetable market.

jer01.jpg

At the southern end of Suq el-Attarin begins the recently excavated Cardo, an elegant arcaded street from the Byzantine era. Shops on either side of the street, added some 600 years later by the Crusaders, have recently been been renovated to accommodate modern goods. Below street level, one can see remains of fortifications from the sixth and first centuries B.C., pieces in the mosaic that is Jerusalem, reminders of destruction and renewal.

East of the Cardo, on Misgav Ladach Road, is the partially restored Church of St. Mary of the Teutonic Knights. The church was established in 1128 to care for German pilgrims who might have felt unwelcome in the French-dominated Crusader Jerusalem. A German traveler in the 12th century described it as ”the German house upon which hardly any men who speak any other lan-guage bestow any benedictions.” The church, which had a hospital and a hospice attached to it, was the modest birthplace of the Teutonic Order, which later became so powerful that it conquered the state of Prussia and gave rise to its militaristic spirit.

The most beautiful Crusader church in Jerusalem is St. Anne, the traditional dwelling of Mary’s parents. It was turned into a madrasa, a religious school, by Saladin after his victory over the Crusaders in 1187, as is testified to by an inscription above the portal. Some seven centuries later, after the Crimean War, the Turks presented this building to the French Government, which committed it to the care of the White Fathers, a religious order.

Romanesque in style, built of white stone, it is pure and austere. The facade is elegant in its simplicity. A plain, triple-pointed arch marks the main portal; above it is a delicately carved molding. Only the top window is adorned, flanked by pillars and capitals. Six cruciform piers divide the interior into a nave and two aisles. The central apse creates a chevet, an unusual rounded projection in the exterior of the eastern wall. Light filters into the sparsely furnished building through a few clerestory windows. The acoustics in St. Anne are superb; to hear mass sung here - divine. (Mass is sung every morning at 6:30.) Some time after the conquest of Jerusalem, the Templars - the order charged with protecting pilgrims in the Holy Land - implanted themselves on the Temple Mount and refurbished the Mosque of Aksa. The Crusaders renamed it Templum Solomonis for Solomon’s Temple, which had stood on the Mount some 2,000 years before. The zigzag central arch in the entry porch is Crusader, as is the small octagonal edifice northwest of the Dome of the Rock. T hat building was turned into Templum Domini, and the octagonal structure served as its baptisary. Known today as the Dome of the Ascension, the former baptisary is a fine example of Crusader architecture.

If one leaves the Temple Mount through Bab el-Silsileh (Gate of the Chain in Arabic) one can see the twisted marble columns on either side of the gate, which probably come from a Crusader structure, as does the ”recycled” rose window in the water fountain across from the gate.

Before leaving Jerusalem one should visit the Citadel, an amalgamation of walls, towers and other fortifications. In the Crusaders’ period, as the city changed hands more than once, the Citadel often served as the defenders’ last stronghold. Nothing is left of the Latin Kings’ palace that stood nearby, and only a few architectural details from that era remain within the Citadel, but at its southwestern corner one can see the glacis and the outer wall of the fosse - the dry moat.

In the autumn of 1099, having fulfilled their vow to redeem Jerusalem, most of the Crusaders returned home. Those who stayed behind were known as the Franks - Christians of European, mostly French, origin. Noblemen, merchants, artisans, even peasants - most of the Franks settled in urban centers such as Jerusalem, Acre, Tiberias and Bethlehem. The country’s indigenous Christians detested the haughty Franks, who had replaced their clergy and liturgy in the churches. The Moslems who survived the First Crusade were mostly farmers who were allowed to continue to till the land and produce foodstuffs for the urban Franks. The Jewish population was almost completely eradicated by the Crusaders.

One of the main tasks of the 150,000 Franks (about a third of the total population) was to keep the highways safe for pilgrims. Since the pilgrims were in constant danger of Saracen attacks, the Franks built a strong network of forts and castles along the borders and on major routes and crossroads. These garrisons were strategically situated on mountain tops and within visual contact of each other; torches and homing pigeons were used to communicate. It was an effective early warning system.

Belvoir, a few miles south of the Sea of Galilee, is a fine example of a castrum, as a small Crusader fort was known. Known in Hebrew as Kochav Hayarden (Star of the Jordan), it commands a sweeping view of Mounts Hermon and Tabor, the Golan, the Sea of Galilee and the Yarmuk and Jordan Valleys. From this fort one could observe any movement on the nearby road, one of the ancient trade routes from Egypt to Damascus, which crosses the Jordan near Beit She’an. Belvoir was built in the middle of the 12th century and served the Knights of St. John, also known as the Order of the Hospitalers. As their name implies, this order was founded to minister to the sick, but later, alongside the Templars, they also guarded the highways and fought the Saracens, the Moslem foe.

jer02.jpg

Belvoir, which was meant to withstand prolonged sieges, is a double fort. The outer portion is a rectangle, 330 by 440 feet long. Square towers stand at the four corners and at regular intervals in between. Entry is over a culvert and through a low, fortified gate. Inside is a courtyard with arcaded corridors that used to house stables and storage areas. The inner fort, also protected by thick walls and corner towers, is built around an open court where one can still see the Hospitalers’ dining quarters, kitchen, ovens and the steps that led to a chapel and bedrooms. The bedrooms are now gone, as is the upper part of the keep.

Belvoir is built of black basalt blocks with white limestone used to accentuate certain vaults and arches. At the crumbling southwestern corner of the moat a typical Crusader building method can be seen: uniformly cut ashlars form both the inside and outside faces of the wall while the middle is filled with rubble and cement. The walls are up to 10 feet wide. Hidden in the outer walls are several staircases leading down to posterns in the moat from which sudden attacks could be launched.

Belvoir served the Hospitalers well until the time of Saladin, to whom it surrendered in 1189, after a year-and-a-half-long siege. In the 1220’s, the fort was partially destroyed by Saladin’s nephew, el-Malek el Mu’azzam.

Before leaving, the visitor might look again at the view and listen to the whispering breezes that gave Belvoir its Arabic name - Kaukab el-Hawa (Star of the Winds).

Keeping the sea lanes open was of vital importance to the Franks, who depended on arms, supplies and men from Europe. Acre, on the coast just north of Haifa, with its natural harbor, was second only to Jerusalem in its importance to the Latin Kingdom. The city, which is at least 4,000 years old, was famous since Phoenician times for its glass and for the dye extracted from the purple murex, a local snail. Alexander the Great stopped here, as did St. Peter and Maimonides - on separate occasions, of course.

King Baldwin I captured the city in 1104. Like other Mediterranean coastal cities, Acre was conquered with the help of Italian merchant fleets. For their assistance, commercial and other privileges were granted to the merchants; Venetians, Genoese, Pisans and Amalfians occupied large sections of Acre. The Orders of the Templars and the Hospitalers dominated the rest of the city, which, noted a contemporary visitor, ”is so populous as to surpass all the rest.” ”It receives all the merchant ships and . . . all the pilgrims for Christ’s sake. The air is corrupted by the enormous influxes of strangers.” A Moslem traveler described it as the ”focus of ships and caravans, and the meeting place of Moslem and Christian merchants . . . Its streets are chocked by the press of men so that it is hard to put foot to ground.” The traveler also commented on the preponderance of crosses and ”pigs” - his term for Christians. Some 40,000 people lived in Acre in the 13th century; the port could accommodate up to 80 ships. L ike most of the country, Acre was conquered by Saladin in 1187, but the balance of power shifted with the arrival of Richard the Lion-Hearted and the Third Crusade. In 1191 Acre returned to Christian hands and became, for a century, the capital of the Latin Kingdom, replacing the fallen Jerusalem.

The grand quarters of the Hospitalers in Acre were built mainly after 1191. A century later, when the Moslems demolished the city, they found the complex too solid to destroy and covered it with rubble. It took the Israelis 12 years to remove over 30,000 cubic feet of debris from the subterranean halls that housed the Master of the Hospitalers and his administration.

The entrance to this subterranean Crusader city is opposite the Mosque of el-Jazzar. After reaching the courtyard through a large Turkish gate, one can see, on the right, several huge rooms covering an area of 500 square yards; the barrel vaults are 25 feet high. This area, known today as the knights’ halls, may have served as barracks. The walk continues left of the court to a partially excavated hall, which may have been the administrative center, the Grand Manier. A narrow passage leads to the most impressive hall, the refectory, a 100-by-50-foot rectangle that was 36 feet high. Marco Polo may have dined in this hall on his way to China.

A 200-foot-long tunnel connects the refectory to six halls with cylindrical, cross-vaulted roofs. Finds from excavations in Acre, including Crusader artifacts, can be seen in the small museum next to the Hospitalers’ complex.

jer04.jpg

Acre, the last Christian stronghold in the Holy Land, came under siege on April 5, 1291. ”The enthusiasm of the Moslems was so great,” wrote one historian, ”that the number of volunteers exceeded the regular forces.” The walls and towers were bombarded by siege machines; the moats began to be filled. King Henry II of Cyprus arrived with his fleet, but it was too late. On May 18 the Saracens ”in numbers past counting” broke through the walls. The Franks who tried to flee were captured and killed. The last tower, held by the Templars, was being undermined when its defenders agreed to surrender. So many Saracens then entered the tower that it collapsed under their weight, crushing hundreds of Christians and Moslems. The conquerors destroyed the city’s markets, towers and walls, and Acre laid in ruins for centuries. Thus ended 200 years of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem.

Sites Associated With the Christian Warriors Where to Go Were they brave, devout and romantic, or cruel, greedy and bloodthirsty? Everyone has preconceptions about the Crusaders.

Four European states came into being in the East after the First Crusade (1097 to 1099). They occupied an area along the eastern Mediterranean coast - today’s Syria, Lebanon and Israel. One of the four states was the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem, whose fortunes and borders kept changing. Basically it covered most of modern Israel.

Out of the dozens of Crusader sites that still exist in modern Israel, three - Jerusalem, Belvoir and Acre - are particularly worth a visit, since they represent three different facets of the Crusaders’ history.

Jerusalem was the heart of the Latin Kingdom, the battle call of the Crusaders, the place where they left a lasting imprint. Belvoir is the country’s best preserved fort; it also commands spectacular vistas.

The coastal city of Acre, 16 miles north of Haifa, was the last stronghold of the Christians in the Holy Land . The city contains the grandest examples of Crusader architecture in Israel. Transportation Most of the Crusaders’ remains in Jerusalem are encompassed by the Old City Wall, an area less than one square mile, and can easily be visited on foot.

Belvoir is about six miles north of Beit She’an. There is no public transportation directly to the fort, but one can rent a car (about $35 a day) and drive to it. From Jerusalem or Tel Aviv, the trip takes a couple of hours, from Haifa somewhat less. On the road to Belvoir, which passes through the Jordan Valley, an orange sign with the words ”Kochav Hayarden (Belvoir)” points west to a road that climbs three miles to the fort.

Regular bus and sherut (taxi) service is available between Haifa and Acre, which is just across the bay. The bus fare is about 25 cents, sherut less than $2.

If you rent a car to visit Belvoir and start early in the day, you can visit the fort, then continue north to Tiberias on the Sea of Galilee, about an hour away, for lunch. After lunch, you can drive on to Acre; that leg of the trip is also about an hour. Hours and Fees The places described in the accompanying article are free and open to the public from 9 A.M. to 5 P.M., with these exceptions:

In Jerusalem, the Church of St. Anne is open daily from 8 A.M. to noon, and from 2 to 5 P.M., but is closed to the public on Sunday. The Temple Mount can be visited daily from 8 to 11 A.M., except Friday. Entry for non-Moslems is through Bab el-Maghrabeh, near the Western Wall.

Belvoir is open daily from 8 A.M. to 4 P.M.; entrance fee is $1. The Crusaders’ City in Acre is open daily from 9 A.M. to 5 P.M., but closes at 1 P.M. on Friday; the fee is $1. Meals and Rooms Jerusalem offers many hotels and restaurants at various price levels.

There are no restaurants or hotels at Belvoir, but meals and lodgings are available in Tiberias. Several open-air restaurants are situated right on the shore of the Sea of Galilee, where the specialty is St. Peter’s fish caught in the freshwater lake. Lunch, at either Nof Kinneret (telephone 20773) or Galei Gil (20699) is $7 to $10, dinner $12 to $15.

There are also many hotels in various price ranges. At the Plaza (92233), a double room, including a large Israeli breakfast, is $100. At Galei Kinneret (92331), a quiet, older hotel, a double, with breakfast is $80. At Ganei Hamat (92890), just outside the city, near the Hot Springs, a double, with breakfast, is $65.

Acre offers two restaurants near the old port - Abu Christo (910065) and Ptolemais (916110). Both have a view of the Mediterranean and serve fresh fish and meat dishes, prepared in Near Eastern style. Lunches is about $10, dinner from $15 to $20. At the Argaman Motel (916691), on the beach, a double room is $60.

More information may be obtained by calling the Ministry of Tourism in Jerusalem (237311).N. R.

By NITZA ROSOVSKY; NITZA ROSOVSKY IS THE AUTHOR OF ”JERUSALEMWALKS” (HOLT, RINEHART & WINSTON).
in The New York Times

Categories: Articles · Crusades · Jerusalem · Opinion · Templar Sites · in English

Templar Leader Creates Foundation to Help Future Generations

October 19, 2007 · 1 Comment

hjs3032o.jpg 

At a meeting at the Capitol Hill Club of Washington, DC, Rear Admiral [Ret.] James J. Carey announced the completion of Phase I of the formation requirements for The Admiral James J. Carey Foundation. The organization has been formally incorporated in the Commonwealth of Virginia, the request for approval as a private foundation has been filed with the U. S. Internal Revenue Service, and Admiral Carey has been named Chairman of the Foundation. The purpose of the foundation is to endow organizations, programs, and projects that are educational, charitable, scientific, or religious in nature and which are supportive of future generations who will hopefully lead America and the world as civilization progresses on Planet Earth.

Asked why he was taking this action now, Admiral Carey responded, “Actually I’ve been working on this effort for the past four years. It has involved a tremendous amount of time in estate planning and legal work to first establish the trust in which to hold my assets in order to provide for my wife and daughters should anything untoward cause my early demise. That effort took over three years to research, develop, structure, and establish as a legal entity and then transfer my assets and holdings into that structure. I finished that late last year and then we went through an extensive similar program to develop and structure the foundation and provide for it’s funding by my trust once my family has been cared for and no longer has need of those assets. That effort is almost completed and now we’re beginning to determine what organizations the foundation will endow, and that is, in part, the reason why the foundation met today”.

Admiral Carey continued, “The foundation’s initial focus is going to be on those organizations and programs that I have been involved with and supportive of during my lifetime. I have over 40 years of service on organization boards of directors, with some of those experiences I consider as good, and some not so good. Indeed, there is nothing like years of board service to learn the inner workings of an organization. You see it all. Which are fiscally sound and prudent and which are not. Which treat their members with dignity and respect and which do not. Which have effective programs that you want to use your lifetime of earnings to support and continue, and which you do not want your money to be used for because you have seen first hand that all too many program “do not do what they say they will do”. Quite frankly, I’m looking forward to using that 40+ years of experience to ensure that what gets funded by this foundation is truly worthy of being funded and can be counted on to provide a true service to the nation or to mankind and civilization in future generations and for centuries to come”.

Documents were circulated at today’s meeting indicating that among the organizations under consideration for endowment are a university, several fraternal organizations, several knighthood Orders, a broad range of youth groups, a equally broad range of national public policy organizations, and several religious Orders.

Endowment plans are structured based upon each individual organization and subject to restrictions as to how the foundation wants it’s endowment to be used. All Admiral James J. Carey Foundation endowments are structured so as to continue annual funding in perpetuity, so long as the restrictions on the endowment are strictly adhered to. Each endowed organization will be required to furnish an annual audit by an independent Certified Public Accounting firm to certify their adherence to the requirements and restrictions of the endowment. Those that do not adhere are subject to having their endowment cancelled and those funds split evenly among the remaining endowees that, in fact, do adhere to the endowment requirements and restrictions.

In closing today’s meeting of the Foundation, Admiral Carey stated, “I’ve been particularly fortunate during my lifetime to have had numerous mentors and organizations that have taken an active interest in my life and whatever talents I may have been born with or taught by my parents and teachers over the years.

One of the reasons I have decided to dedicate my entire estate to this foundation is, in part, to pay back to society in recognition of those who helped me succeed in life, since I am unable to repay these mentors individually as almost all are no longer living. In recognizing them, and in endowing deserving organizations and programs that will serve society and our culture in future centuries, hopefully I will be providing for future generations to have some of the same successes in life that have come to me. I truly hope so, and take these steps today as the beginning of the process to bring these endowments to fruition.

I thank everyone that has agreed to help me bring these efforts to a successful and worthwhile achievement. Together, we can do much good for America, and today we begin that effort”.

The Admiral James J. Carey Foundation will operate in the Commonwealth of Virginia. It is Admiral Carey’s intent to spend the remainder of his life managing the assets and programs of the foundation, aided by his two daughters, Lynn Margaret Carey of Denver, Colorado, and Sarah Ann Carey Cancel of San Diego, California, who will succeed him as Trustees of the Foundation should he become infirmed or when he dies. It is the intent of the foundation to establish a web site once final Internal Revenue Service approval is received of the foundation’s 501.c.3 private foundation application. In the interim, the foundation may be contacted via e-mail at RADMCarey@aol.com

__________________________________________________

Why is the Templar Globe associating with an iniciative by the Grand Master of a different branch of the Order?

The Templar Globe is indeed the official bulletin of the OSMTHU, edited by the Chancellery. And Rear Admiral James J. Carey is indeed Grand Master of the OSMTH, another branch - or obedience - of the Order.

We are aware that we live in a world full of so called templar orders that can’t trace their origins beyond a daydream last week, all of them exclusive angry rivals, throwing anathema at each other. For that reason, the Templar Globe does not report on their activities and sudden spurs of fame.

However our obedience and the one presided over by Admiral James Carey can trace their history in detail for several decades if not centuries and in the distant past shared the same origin, coming from the same Order. None of them claims to be the only true Templar Order suspended by Rome and now born from the ashes, owner of some secret revelation that could sell millions of books, though.

The fact that our obedience has its statutes deposited near the European Commission and has completed the registration as an International Organization and the fact that the obedience presided by Admiral James Carey has been granted ONG status by the United Nations - the first, and up to this moment only, Templar organization to be distinguished with such a honour - tells volumes about what sets both organizations apart from the world of petty rivalry of common so called templar circles.

The fact that we are now two different branches from the same original tree is circumstantial and is more a reflex of recent history than of any real rivalry. We keep our individual characteristics, our own leadership and follow our democratic will serving our members and the community, living Templar ideals to the fullest in our daily lives. So, when the OSMTH has something to report such as the creation of this new Foundation we feel naturally compelled to associate with the initiative and support it as much as we can.

We want the Templar Globe to be the source of relevant, credible news about the Templars past and present. But when it comes to the present, we’re sorry if we are very picky…

One last word about Admiral James Carey. It’s common to hear scholars, leaders, researchers, students, simple amateurs, committed fans of Templar history and values, comment at length on all sorts of details about the virtues of Charity and Beneficence. It is however rare to find someone whose character has been so deeply carved by the Templar spirit that he decides to take the ultimate step and dedicate the last (let’s hope long) stage of his presence among us to put all that he gathered, all that God directed his way, all that remained after a full accomplished life, place it all at the service of others. You can close all your Templar books now and you can cease all preaching. Example is the ultimate Templar weapon.

Thank you for not putting on your sleepers and selfishly fade away, brother Carey. I hope to be listening and have the same strength and clarity of mind when God whispers in my hear.

Luis de Matos

Chancellor

OSMTHU

Categories: Charity · News · United States · in English

Tips for would-be Knights Templar

October 18, 2007 · 2 Comments

two_templars.jpg

A medieval Christian military order spawning myths and whispers of clandestine power that fuel best-sellers, the Knights Templar have captivated imaginations ever since they emerged from obscurity in the 1100s.

With the publication of a reproduction of the minutes of trials against the Templars (5,900 euros a copy), the Vatican will let scholars examine some of the accusations of heresy and sexual misconduct that spurred their downfall.

Seven hundred years ago almost to the day since they were arrested, fact and fiction are hard to distinguish on the topic. But following are some tips for modern worldly travelers on the KT trail:

* VISIT:

– JERUSALEM: The Templars took their name from the Temple Mount and their headquarters were in a building that now makes up part of the Al Aqsa Mosque. Baldwin II, the Crusader king of Jerusalem, gave them the headquarters in 1123, which led to them taking the name.

– BERLIN: Tempelhof, the site of the Berlin airport of the same name which became famous during the 1948 airlift, started out as a commandry — a district controlled by a member of the order, with a headquarters for members — of the Knights Templar. A village called Tempelhof developed around it and is now part of the city of Berlin.

* SKILLS TO DEVELOP:

– Swordsmanship. Originally founded to protect Christian pilgrims to the Holy Land, the order assumed greater military duties during the 12th century.

– Crusading drive. Following the success of the First Crusade 1095-99, a number of Crusader states were established in the Holy Land — but they lacked military strength to maintain more than a tenuous hold over their territories.

– Community spirit. Most Crusaders had tried to return safely home after fulfilling their vows but many Christian pilgrims to Jerusalem were attacked by Muslim raiders. Around 1119, some knights led by Hugh de Payns vowed to protect the pilgrims and form a religious community for that purpose.

* OATHS TO SWEAR:

– The Knights Templar swore oaths of poverty, chastity and obedience and renounced the world, just like the Cistercians and other monks. (However the Templars eventually acquired great wealth and owned properties scattered throughout western Europe, the Mediterranean, and the Holy Land.)

* DATES TO AVOID:

– It was only when Philip IV ordered the arrest on October 13, 1307, of every Templar in France and sequestered all their property there, that most people became aware of the extent of the alleged crimes of the order. Some speculate that this is one reason why Friday 13th came to be known as unlucky.

* HOW TO JOIN?

– We haven’t tried it but this looks like an option: http://www.osmth.org/.

[Reuters overlooked a few things, we will add a few in a new post]

[And you can try joining by emailing here: osmthu@mail.com]

by Reuters USA

Categories: Articles · News · Opinion · in English

The Eucharist

October 17, 2007 · No Comments

eucharist.jpg 

The Eucharist, which is also called the Holy Communion, Mass, the Lord’s Supper or the Divine Liturgy, is a sacrament accepted by almost all Christians.

Christians don’t say that they ‘do’ or ‘carry out’ the Eucharist; they celebrate it. In some churches, the person who takes the leading role in the ceremony is called the celebrant.

What happens
The Eucharist is a re-enactment of the Last Supper, the final meal that Jesus Christ shared with his disciples before his arrest, and eventual crucifixion. At the meal Jesus ate bread and wine and instructed his disciples to do the same in memory of him.

The prayers and readings in a Eucharistic service remind those taking part of that final meal and of the solemn words and actions of someone standing at the edge of death.

The people taking part drink a sip of wine (or grape juice) and eat a tiny piece of some form of bread, both of which have been consecrated.

Different churches have different ways of doing this, and different ways of understanding what it means, and what spiritual events are happening at the time.

Maundy Thursday
In the UK, Maundy Thursday of Holy Week is so named because it is recognised as the anniversary of the Last Supper and the beginning of the institution of the Eucharist.

Maundy comes from the Latin word mandatum, meaning commandment, in Jesus’s phrase A new commandment I give to you.

A new covenant
The Eucharist symbolises the new covenant given by God to his followers. The old covenant was the one given by God to Israel when he freed his people from slavery in Egypt.

The new sacrament symbolises freedom from the slavery of sin and the promise of eternal life. According to the Synpotic Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke, the Eucharist was instituted by Jesus, who said the following:

Take, eat, this is my body… Take, drink, this is my blood… Do this in remembrance of me.
Jesus
What it means
Christians believe that the piece of bread that is “taken, blessed, broken and given” becomes the life of Jesus, the body of Christ.

But they don’t all mean the same thing by it, and some of the biggest disputes among Christians are about exactly what they do mean.

Different churches, different meanings
Although all denominations recognise the importance of the Eucharist, they differ about its meaning.

Roman Catholics believe that the bread and wine that is offered is the actual body and blood of Christ and another form of sacrifice. They believe that although the bread and wine physically remain the same, it is transformed beyond human comprehension into the body, blood soul and divinity of Jesus. This is called Transubstantiation.

Protestants believe that Jesus made his sacrifice on the cross and simply follow the tradition of the sacrament in memory of the event, recalling its symbolic importance in the life of Jesus.

Churches also differ in how often they receive the Eucharist. The more importance a Church places on the sacraments, the more often its members will receive the Eucharist.

For Roman Catholics, the Eucharist is the most important act of worship. All Roman Catholics are encouraged to receive communion at least once a week during Mass. Some practising Catholics may receive the Eucharist every day.

Other denominations receive Holy Communion less frequently and usually services are held once a week or every few weeks.

No magic
It’s very easy to get stuck into complex arguments about what happens to the piece of bread; what exactly it turns into, and how. There’s a risk that if people get stuck in an argument about magical changes in bread they’ll forget that they are part of the ritual, and the way they respond to it is a vital part of the package.

But you can get a great deal of meaning about the Eucharist without worrying about that.

Christians say that there is a common action in what happens to the bread, and what God has done with Jesus and with human lives.

In Jesus, God took a human body, blessed it, and was broken in it.

Ordinary Christians believe that God has taken their lives, blessed them, broken them, and remade them.

The piece of bread is taken, blessed and broken, too.

And in all three of these actions human bodies, or pieces of bread become filled with the life of Christ.

What’s a sacrament?
Christians regard a sacrament as an outward sign of an inward grace or as an enacted truth. But that’s probably not much more helpful…

Here’s another definition: A sacrament is an an action made holy or special because of its believed ability to demonstrate a religious truth, or a truth about God.

Think about it like this… if someone says “I love you” and you believe them, that’s great. If they say “I love you”, and put their arms round you and give you a great big hug, you get the truth of what they’re saying in a different and more powerful way. A hug is an outward sign of the love they have inside.

Or take some of the saints of old who gave their lives for others. Saying that you love all humanity is one thing. Dying to save others is a very powerful way of acting out the truth of your words.

in BBC - Religion

Categories: Articles · Opinion · Religion · Spirituality · in English

Hope

October 16, 2007 · No Comments

dem-hope-despair-l.jpg 

Hope, in its widest acceptation, is described as the desire of something together with the expectation of obtaining it. The Scholastics say that it is a movement of the appetite towards a future good, which though hard to attain is possible of attainment. Consideration of this state of soul is limited in this article to its aspect as a factor in the supernatural order. Looked at in this way it is defined to be a Divine virtue by which we confidently expect, with God’s help, to reach eternal felicity as well as to have at our disposal the means of securing it. It is said to be Divine not merely because its immediate object is God, but also because of the special manner of its origin. Hope, such as we are here contemplating, is an infused virtue; ie., it is not, like good habits in general, the outcome of repeated acts or the product of our own industry. Like supernatural faith and charity it is directly implanted in the soul by Almighty God. Both in itself and in the scope of its operation it outstrips the limits of the created order, and is to be had if at all only through the direct largess of the Creator. The capacity which it confers is not only the strengthening of an existing power, but rather the elevation, the transforming of a faculty for the performance of functions essentially outside its natural sphere of activity. All of this is intelligible only on the basis, which we take for granted, that there is such a thing as the supernatural order, and that the only realizable ultimate destiny of man in the present providence of God lies in that order.

Hope is termed a theological virtue because its immediate object is God, as is true of the other two essentially infused virtues, faith and charity. St. Thomas acutely says that the theological virtues are so called “because they have God for their object, both in so far as by them we are properly directed to Him, and because they are infused into our souls by God alone, as also, finally, because we come to know of them only by Divine revelation in the Sacred Scriptures”. Theologians enlarge upon this idea by saying that Almighty God is both the material and the formal object of hope. He is the material object because He is that which is chiefly, though not solely, aimed at when we elicit acts of this virtue- ie., whatever else is looked for is only desired in so far as it bears a relation to Him. Hence according to the generally followed teaching, not only supernatural helps, particularly such as are necessary for our salvation, but also things in the temporal order, inasmuch as they can be means to reach the supreme end of human life, may be the material objects of supernatural hope. It is worthwhile noting here that in a strict construction of the term we cannot properly hope for eternal life for someone other than ourselves. The reason is that it is of the nature of hope to desire and expect something apprehended precisely as the good or happiness of the one who hopes (bonum proprium). In a qualified sense, however, that is so far as love may have united us with others, we may hope for others as well as for ourselves.

By the formal object of hope we understand the motive or motives which lead us to entertain a confident expectation of a happy issue to our efforts in the matter of eternal salvation notwithstanding the difficulties which beset our path. Theologians are not of one mind in determining what is to be assigned as the sufficient reason of supernatural hope. Mazzella (De Virtutibus Infusis, disp. v, art. 2), whose judgment has the merit of simplicity as well as that of adequate analysis, finds the foundation of our hope in two things. It is based, according to him, on our apprehension of God as our supreme supernatural good Whose communication in the beatific vision is to make us happy for all eternity, and also on those Divine attributes such as omnipotence, mercy and fidelity, which unite to exhibit God as our unfailing helper. These considerations, he thinks, motive our wills or furnish the answer to the question why we hope. Of course it is taken for granted that the yearning for God, not simply because of His own infinite perfections but explicitly because He is to be our reward, is a righteous temper of soul, otherwise the spiritual attitude of hope in which such a longing is included would not be a virtue at all. Luther and Calvin were at one in insisting that only the product of the perfect love of God, ie. the love of God for His own sake, was to be regarded as morally good. Consequently they rejected as sinful whatever was done only through consideration of eternal reward or, in other words, through that love of God which the Scholastics call “amor concupiscentiae”. The Council of Trent (Sess. vi, can. 31) stigmatized these errors as heresy: “If anyone says that a justified person sins when such a one does what is right through hope of eternal reward, let him be anathema”. In spite of this unequivocal pronouncement of the council, Baius, the celebrated Louvain theologian, substantially reiterated the false doctrine of the Reformers on this point. His teaching on the matter was formulated in the thirty-eighth proposition extracted from his works, and was condemned by St. Pius V. According to him there is no true act of virtue except what is elicited by charity, and as all love is either of God or His creatures, all love which is not the love of God for His own sake, ie. for His own infinite perfections, is depraved cupidity and a sin. Of course in such a theory there could not properly speaking be any place for the virtue of hope as we understand it. It is easy also to see how it fits in with the initial Protestant position of identifying faith and confidence and thus making hope rather an act of the intellect than of the will. For if we may not hope, in the Catholic sense, for blessedness, the only substitute available seems to be belief in the Divine mercy and promises.

It is a truth constantly acted upon in Catholic life and no less explicitly taught, that hope is necessary to salvation. It is necessary first of all as an indispenssible means (necessitate medii) of attaining salvation, so that no one can enter upon eternal bliss without it. Hence even infants, though they cannot have elicited the act, must have had the habit of hope infused in Baptism. Faith is said to be “the substance of things hoped for” (Hebrews 2:1), and without it “it is impossible to please God” (ibid ., xi, 6). Obviously, therefore, hope is required for salvation with the same absolute necessity as faith. Moreover, hope is necessary because it is prescribed by law, the natural law which, in the hypothesis that we are destined for a supernatural end, obliges us to use the means suited to that end. Further, it is prescribed by the positive Divine law, as, for instance, in the first Epistle of St. Peter, i, 13: “Trust perfectly in the grace which is offered you in the revelation of Jesus Christ”.

There is both a negative and a positive precept of hope. The negative precept is in force ever and always. Hence there can never be a contingency in which one may lawfully despair or presume. The positive precept enjoining the exercise of the virtue of hope demands fulfilment sometimes, because one has to discharge certain Christian duties which involve an act of this supernatural confidence, such as prayer, penance, and the like. Its obligation is then said, in the language of the schools, to be per accidens. On the other hand, there are times when it is binding without any such spur, because of its own intrinsic importance, or per se. How often this is so in the lifetime of a Christian, is not susceptible of exact determination, but that it is so is quite clear from the tenor of a proposition condemned by Alexander VII: “Man is at no time during his life bound to elicit an act of faith, hope and charity as a consequence of Divine precepts appertaining to these virtues”. It is, however, perhaps not superfluous to note that the explicit act of hope is not exacted. The average good Christian, who is solicitous about living up to his beliefs, implicitly satisfies the duty imposed by the precept of hope.

The doctrine herein set forth as to the necessity of Christian hope was impugned in the seventeenth century by the curious mixture of fanatical mysticism and false spirituality called Quietism. This singular array of errors was given to the world by a Spanish priest named Miguel Molinos. He taught that to arrive at the state of perfection it was essential to lay aside all self-love to such an extent that one became indifferent as to one’s own progress, salvation, or damnation. The condition of soul to be aimed at was one of absolute quiet brought about by the absence of every sort of desire or anything that could be construed as such. Hence, to quote the words of the seventh of the condemned propositions taken from Molinos’s Spiritual Guide, “the soul must not occupy itself with any thought whether of reward or punishment, heaven or hell, death or eternity”. As a result one ought not to entertain any hope as to one’s salvation; for that, as a manifestation of selfwill, implies imperfection. For the same reason petitions to Almighty God about anything whatever are quite out of place. No resistance, except of a purely negative sort, should be offered to temptations, and an entirely passive attitude should be fostered in every respect. In the year 1687 Innocent XII condemned sixty-eight propositions embodying this extraordinary doctrine as heretical, blasphemous, scandalous, etc. He likewise consigned the author to perpetual confinement in a monastery, where, having previously abjured his errors, he died in the year 1696. About the same time a species of pseudomysticism, largely identical with that of Molinos, but omitting the objectionable conclusions, was defended by Madame Guyon. It even found an advocate in Fénelon who engaged in a controversy with Bossuet on the subject. Ultimately twenty-three propositions drawn from Fénelon’s Explanation of the maxims of the Saints on the interior life were proscribed by Innocent XII. The gist of the teaching, so far as we are concerned, was that there is in this life a state of perfection with which it is impossible to reconcile any love of God except that which is absolutely disinterested, which therefore does not contemplate possession of God as our reward. It would follow that the act of hope is incompatible with such a state, since it postulates precisely a desire for God, not only because He is good in Himself, but also and formally because He is our adequate and final good. Hope is less perfect than charity, but that admission does not involve a moral deformity of any kind, still less is it true that we can or ought to pass our lives in a quasi uninterrupted act of pure love of God. As a matter of fact, there is no such state anywhere identifiable, and if there were it would not be inconsistent with Christian hope.

The question as to the necessity of hope is followed with some natural sequence by the inquiry as to its certitude. Manifestly, if hope be absolutely required as a means to salvation, there is an antecedent presumption that its use must in some sense be accompanied by certainty. It is clear that, as certitude is properly speaking a predicate of the intellect, it is only in a derived sense, or as St. Thomas says participative, that we can speak of hope, which is largely a matter of the will, as being certain. In other words, hope, whose office is to elevate and strengthen our wills, is said to share the certitude of faith, whose abiding place is our intellects. For our purpose it is of importance to recall what it is that, being apprehended by our intellect, is said to do service as the foundation of Christian hope. This has already been determined to be the concept of God as our helper gathered from reflecting on His goodness, mercy, omnipotence, and fidelity to His promises. In a subordinate sense our hope is built upon our own merits, as the eternal reward is not forthcoming except to those who shall have employed their free will to co-operate with the aids afforded by God’s bounty. Now there is a threefold certitude discernible.

1. A thing is said to be certain conditionally when, another thing being given, the first infallibly follows. Supernatural hope is evidently certain in this way, because, granted that a man does all that is required to save his soul, he is sure to attain to eternal life. This is guaranteed by the infinite power and goodness and fidelity of God

2. There is a certainty proper to virtues in general in so far as they are principles of action. Thus for instance a really temperate man may be counted on to be uniformly sober. Hope being a virtue may claim this moral certainty inasmuch as it constantly and after an established method encourages us to look for eternal blessedness to be had by the Divine munificence and as the crown of our own merits accumulated through grace.

3. Finally, a thing is certain absolutely, ie., not conditionally upon the verification of some other thing, but quite independently of any such event. In this case no room for doubt is left. Is hope certain in this meaning of the word? So far as the secondary material object of hope is concerned, ie. those graces which are at least remotely adequate for salvation, we can be entirely confident that these are most certainly provided. As to the primary material object of hope namely, the face-to-face vision of God, the Catholic doctrine, as set forth in the sixth session of the Council of Trent, is that our hope is unqualifiedly certain if we consider only the Divine attributes, which are its support, and which cannot fail. If, however, we limit our attention to the sum total of salutary operation which we contribute and upon which we also lean as upon the reason of our expectation, then, prescinding from the case of an individual revelation, hope is to be pronounced uncertain. This is plainly for the reason that we cannot in advance insure ourselves against the weakness or the malice of our free wills.
This doctrine is in direct antagonism to the initial Protestant contention that we can and must be altogether certain of our salvation. The only thing required for this end, according to the teaching of the Reformers, was the special faith or confidence in the promises which alone, without good works, justified a man. Hence, even though there were no good works distinguishable in a person’s earthly career, such a one might and ought, notwithstanding, cherish a firm hope, provided only that he did not cease to believe.

Assuming that the seat of hope is our will, we may ask whether, having been once infused, it can ever be lost. The answer is that it can be destroyed, both by the perpetration of the sin of despair, which is its formal opposite, and by the subtraction of the habit of faith, which assigns the motives for it. It is not so clear that the sin of presumption expels the supernatural virtue of hope, although of course it cannot coexist with the act. We need not be detained with the inquiry whether a man could continue to hope if his eternal damnation had been revealed to him. Theologians are agreed in regarding such a revelation as practically, if not absolutely, impossible. If, by an all but clearly absurd hypothesis, we suppose Almighty God to have revealed to anyone in advance that he was surely to be lost, such a person obviously could no longer hope. Do the souls in Purgatory hope? It is the commonly held opinion that, as they have not yet been admitted to the intuitive vision of God, and as there is nothing otherwise in their condition which is at variance with the concept of this virtue, they have the habit and elicit the act of hope. As to the damned, the concordant judgment is that, as they have been deprived of every other supernatural gift, so also knowing well the perpetuity of their reprobation, they can no longer hope. With reference to the blessed in heaven, St. Thomas holds that, possessing what they have striven for, they can no longer be said to have the theological virtue of hope. The words of St. Paul (Romans 8:24) are to the point: “For we are saved by hope. But hope that is seen, is not hope. For what a man seeth, why doth he hope for?” They can still desire the glory which is to be proper to their risen bodies and also by reason of the bonds of charity, they can wish for the salvation of others, but this is not, properly speaking, hope. The human Soul of Christ furnishes an example. Because of the hypostatic union It was already enjoying the beatific vision. At the same time, because of the passible nature with which He had clothed Himself, He was in the state of pilgrimage (in statu viatoris), and hence He could look forward with longing to His assumption of the qualities of the glorified body. This however was not hope, because hope has as its main object union with God in heaven.

in The Catholic Encyclopedia, New York, 1910

Categories: Articles · Religion · Spirituality · in English

Medieval church rebuilt

October 15, 2007 · No Comments

050123a.jpg 

A 13th Century church, which was dismantled and rebuilt 50 miles away at a museum in Cardiff, has been opened by the Archbishop of Canterbury.

St Teilo’s Church has been recreated stone-by-stone over 20 years at the National History Museum, St Fagans.

The church from Pontarddulais near Swansea has been restored to recreate its appearance in 1520.

Copies of a rare series of 16th Century paintings, which were uncovered as it was being dismantled, adorn the walls.

First Minister Rhodri Morgan also attended the ceremony with the archbishop, Dr Rowan Williams.

Mr Morgan believes his great-grandparents married at the church, which was used regularly until 1850 and then occasionally during the summer until 1985.

The first minister said: “I have watched the incredible skills of the restoration team that have reconstructed the building and saved the frescoes.

“This is a stunning addition to the treasure trove of Welsh history contained in St Fagans.”

The museum has a number of buildings, representing Wales through the ages, but this was one of its most ambitious projects.

Dr Williams said the church’s restoration was an “amazing achievement” and a “real triumph for the country”.

The archbishop, who is himself from Swansea, said the restoration was also part of the process of discovering more about Wales’ history in the Middle Ages.

Flourishing culture

“Our history didn’t just begin when they discovered coal, our history didn’t end when the Romans left.

There’s a long period in-between, when we were part of Europe and a big flourishing culture,” said the archbishop.

Curator Gerallt Nash said: “Before we actually started the work of dismantling the building, we carried out a rescue operation to uncover what was hidden away beneath layer upon layers of lime wash.

“That was when we found the amazing series of wall paintings here.”

The discovery influenced the decision to reconstruct the church as it would have looked in the 16th Century - prior to the Reformation.

Specialist craftsmen used traditional methods to build what according to the museum is the UK’s first authentic reconstruction of a medieval masonry-built church.

It contains all the elements of a late medieval Catholic church, including a rood screen and a loft, elaborately carved from oak.

Head carpenter Ray Smith said some of the original roof trusses had been saved, but timber had also been sourced from Ruabon near Wrexham.

“I bought all the timbers for the project while they were still standing, so I know where every tree has come from,” he said.

Fruit trees

The timber for the rood screen - which Mr Smith described as a carved oak screen separating the nave from the chancel - was sourced from Radnorshire.

He researched the history of St Teilo, the patron saint of horses and fruit trees, in order to carve his life story into the screen.

Mr Smith explained the screen had been used in medieval times to keep the congregation out of the chancel - the area where the altar was located.

He said: “It’s been a big learning curve for lots of people, because the history involved in recreating a medieval building… is new to most people in this country, in fact, probably around the world.”

Those who remember the church in its original location were invited to a service held by their vicar, Reverend John Walters, as part of its opening on the museums’ 100-acre site.

Rev Walters said: “The church had not been used regularly since 1850, apart from three services a year during the summer months.

“Eventually with slates being stolen from the roof it was decided that something had to be done,” he explained.

Rev Walters said entering the church would be strange in two ways for the congregation.

“Most of the people who do remember it there and who remember going to services there in the summer will have quite a surprise, because it’s going to be ‘dressed up’ as it were in its medieval guise.”

Mr Smith added: “It’s going to be a really big ‘wow’ factor when the people of Pontarddulais walk in there for the first time.”

in BBCNews

Categories: Articles · England and Wales · News · Religion · in English

Knights Templar win heresy reprieve after 700 years

October 12, 2007 · 1 Comment

genimage.jpg

The Knights Templar, the medieval Christian military order accused of heresy and sexual misconduct, will soon be partly rehabilitated when the Vatican publishes trial documents it had closely guarded for 700 years.

A reproduction of the minutes of trials against the Templars, “‘Processus Contra Templarios — Papal Inquiry into the Trial of the Templars”‘ is a massive work and much more than a book — with a 5,900 euros ($8,333) price tag.

“This is a milestone because it is the first time that these documents are being released by the Vatican, which gives a stamp of authority to the entire project,” said Professor Barbara Frale, a medievalist at the Vatican’s Secret Archives.

“Nothing before this offered scholars original documents of the trials of the Templars,” she told Reuters in a telephone interview ahead of the official presentation of the work on October 25.

The epic comes in a soft leather case that includes a large-format book including scholarly commentary, reproductions of original parchments in Latin, and — to tantalize Templar buffs — replicas of the wax seals used by 14th-century inquisitors.

Reuters was given an advance preview of the work, of which only 799 numbered copies have been made.

One parchment measuring about half a meter wide by some two meters long is so detailed that it includes reproductions of stains and imperfections seen on the originals.

Pope Benedict will be given the first set of the work, published by the Vatican Secret Archives in collaboration with Italy’s Scrinium cultural foundation, which acted as curator and will have exclusive world distribution rights.

The Templars, whose full name was “Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon,” were founded in 1119 by knights sworn to protecting Christian pilgrims visiting the Holy Land after the Crusaders captured Jerusalem in 1099.

They amassed enormous wealth and helped finance wars of some European monarchs. Legends of their hidden treasures, secret rituals and power have figured over the years in films and bestsellers such as “The Da Vinci Code.”

The Knights have also been portrayed as guardians of the legendary Holy Grail, the cup used by Christ at the Last Supper before his crucifixion.

The Vatican expects most copies of the work to be bought up by specialized libraries at top universities and by leading medieval scholars.

BURNED AT THE STAKE

The Templars went into decline after Muslims re-conquered the Holy Land at the end of the 13th century and were accused of heresy by King Philip IV of France, their foremost persecutor. Their alleged offences included denying Christ and secretly worshipping idols.

The most titillating part of the documents is the so-called Chinon Parchment, which contains phrases in which Pope Clement V absolves the Templars of charges of heresy, which had been the backbone of King Philip’s attempts to eliminate them.

Templars were burned at the stake for heresy by King Philip’s agents after they made confessions that most historians believe were given under duress.

The parchment, also known as the Chinon Chart, was “misplaced” in the Vatican archives until 2001, when Frale stumbled across it.

“The parchment was catalogued incorrectly at some point in history. At first I couldn’t believe my eyes. I was incredulous,” she said.

“This was the document that a lot of historians were looking for,” the 37-year-old scholar said.

Philip was heavily indebted to the Templars, who had helped him finance his wars, and getting rid of them was a convenient way of cancelling his debts, some historians say.

Frale said Pope Clement was convinced that while the Templars had committed some grave sins, they were not heretics.

SPITTING ON THE CROSS

Their initiation ceremony is believed to have included spitting on the cross, but Frale said they justified this as a ritual of obedience in preparation for possible capture by Muslims. They were also said to have practiced sodomy.

“Simply put, the pope recognized that they were not heretics but guilty of many other minor crimes — such as abuses, violence and sinful acts within the order,” she said. “But that is not the same as heresy.”

Despite his conviction that the Templars were not guilty of heresy, in 1312 Pope Clement ordered the Templars disbanded for what Frale called “the good of the Church” following his repeated clashes with the French king.

Frale depicted the trials against the Templars between 1307 and 1312 as a battle of political wills between Clement and Philip, and said the document means Clement’s position has to be reappraised by historians.

“This will allow anyone to see what is actually in documents like these and deflate legends that are in vogue these days,” she said.

Rosi Fontana, who has helped the Vatican coordinate the project, said: “The most incredible thing is that 700 years have passed and people are still fascinated by all of this.”

“The precise reproduction of the parchments will allow scholars to study them, touch them, admire them as if they were dealing with the real thing,” Fontana said.

“But even better, it means the originals will not deteriorate as fast as they would if they were constantly being viewed,” she said.

By Philip Pullella, Reuters

Categories: Articles · News · Vatican · in English

Medieval women ‘had girl power’

October 11, 2007 · No Comments

k7120.gif 

A new study by an academic says that “girl power” was alive and kicking around 600 years ago.

Dr Sue Niebrzydowski at Bangor university said medieval women enjoyed a golden era with a greater life expectancy than men.

“We found women running priories, commissioning books, taking early package tours to visit the Holy Land,” she said.

She added women were also defending their property and property rights.

Dr Niebrzydowski’s research involving middle aged women in the middle ages will be discussed at a conference at the university on Wednesday.

The medievalist at Bangor’s Institute of Early and Modern Studies, studied legal records, literature and songs to build up a picture of life for women between the 12th and 15th Centuries.

Dr Niebrzydowski, whose research is funded by the Royal Historical Society and the British Academy, said: “Women were often widowed by the age of 30 and it gave them greater freedom.

“They could be more sexually liberated as there would be no child as evidence of their fornication or adultery.

‘Misconceptions’

“And if wealthy, they could enter the marriage market on their own terms - and for their own reasons, whether economic, for love, companionship or pleasure.”

The study’s findings will be explored on Wednesday at a conference in Bangor, attended by some of Britain’s top female academics in the fields of archaeology, history, language and law.

Dr Niebrzydowski said: “We assume that women in the past had little economic independence or social power and that they were reliant on fathers or husbands for most of their lives.

“But we should be wary of holding too many misconceptions about women’s lives in the past.

“It is true that most of the information we have is drawn from art, literature or historical records which relate to wealthier women, but middle aged women in the middle ages had far more power and independence than we might first imagine.”

The conference, which runs until Friday, will bring together experts in literature, archaeology, art and history.

in BBC News

Categories: